Universal health insurance in Africa: a narrative review of the literature on institutional models.

INTRODUCTION: Several African countries have introduced universal health insurance (UHI) programmes. These programmes aim to extend health insurance to groups that are usually excluded, namely informal workers and the indigent. Countries use different approaches. The purpose of this article is to study their institutional characteristics and their contribution to the achievement of universal health coverage (UHC) goals. METHOD: This study is a narrative review. It focused on African countries with a UHI programme for at least 4 years. We identified 16 countries. We then compared how these UHI schemes mobilise, pool and use funds to purchase healthcare. Finally, we synthesised how all these aspects contribute to achieving the main objectives of UHC (access to care and financial protection). RESULTS: Ninety-two studies were selected. They found that government-run health insurance was the dominant model in Africa and that it produced better results than community-based health insurance (CBHI). They also showed that private health insurance was marginal. In a context with a large informal sector and a substantial number of people with low contributory capacity, the review also confirmed the limitations of contribution-based financing and the need to strengthen tax-based financing. It also showed that high fragmentation and voluntary enrolment, which are considered irreconcilable with universal insurance, characterise most UHI systems in Africa. CONCLUSION: Public health insurance is more likely to contribute to the achievement of UHC goals than CBHI, as it ensures better management and promotes the pooling of resources on a larger scale.

Impact of community-based health insurance on healthcare utilisation and out-of-pocket expenditures for the poor in Senegal.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the impact of the subsidised community health insurance scheme in Senegal particularly on the poor. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study used data from a household survey conducted in 2019 in three regions, representing 29.3% of the total population. Inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was applied for the analysis. PARTICIPANTS: 1766 households with 15 584 individuals selected through a stratified random sampling with two draws. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The impact of community-based health insurance (CBHI) was evaluated on poor people's access to care and on their financial protection. For the measurement of access to care, we were interested in the use of health services and non-withdrawal from care in case of illness. To assess financial protection, we looked at out-of-pocket expenditure by type of provider and by type of service, the weight of out-of-pocket expenditure on household income, non-exposure to impoverishing health expenditure and non-exposure to catastrophic health expenditure. RESULTS: The results indicate that the CBHI increases primary healthcare utilisation for non-poor (OR 1.36 (CI90 1.02-1.8) for the general scheme and 1.37 (CI90 1.06-1.77) for the special scheme for indigent recipients of social cash transfers), protect them against catastrophic (OR 1.63 (CI90 1.12-2.39)) or impoverishing (OR 2.4 (CI90 1.27-4.5)) health expenditures. However, CBHI has no impact on the poor's healthcare utilisation (OR 0.61 (CI90 0.4-0.94)) and do not protect them from the burden related to healthcare expenditures (OR: 0.27 (CI90 0.13-0.54)). CONCLUSION: Our study found that CBHI has an impact on the non-poor but does not sufficiently protect the poor. This leads us to conclude that a health insurance programme designed for the general population may not be appropriate for the poor. A qualitative study should be conducted to better understand the non-financial barriers to accessing care that may disproportionately affect the poorest.